Three Judges Bench - CaseCiter

CaseCiter

Sign in

Three Judges Bench

A collection of 11 posts

Consumer Protection Act

Bar Of Indian Lawyers vs DK Gandhi - Consumer Protection Act - Reference

Consumer Protection Act - In Bar Of Indian Lawyers vs DK Gandhi, two judges bench doubted the correctness of the judgment in Indian Medical Association Vs. V.P. Shantha” (1995) 6 SCC 651 - Whether a ‘profession’ could be treated as ‘business’ or ‘trade’ and, therefore, covered within the ambit

Constitution Of India

In Re Manoj Tibrewal Akash - Road Widening Projects 2024 INSC 863- Demolition - Bulldozer Justice

Bulldozer Justice- Justice through bulldozers is unknown to any civilized system of jurisprudence. There is a grave danger that if high handed and unlawful behaviour is permitted by any wing or officer of the state, demolition of citizens’ properties will take place as a selective reprisal for extraneous reasons. Citizens’

Constitution Of India Featured

Justice Shailendra Singh vs Union of India 2024 INSC 862 - HC Judges - Conditions of Service - Retiral Dues

Constitution of India 1950 - Article 221 - (i) The High Courts are constitutional institutions and upon appointment as judges of the High Court, all judges, irrespective of the source from which they are drawn, partake the character of holders of constitutional offices in equal measure; (ii) Neither Article 221(

Specific Relief Act Featured

Siddamsetty Infra Projects Pvt. Ltd. vs Katta Sujatha Reddy 2024 INSC 861 - SC Rules - Review - S 52 TP Act - Lis Pendens - Contract Law - Specific Performance

Case Details Case name: Siddamsetty Infra Projects Pvt. Ltd. vs Katta Sujatha Reddy Coram: CJI DY Chandrachud, Justices JB Pardiwala and Manoj Misra Citation: 2024 INSC 861 Transfer of Property Act 1882 - Section 52 -The following conditions ought to be fulfilled for the doctrine of lis pendens to apply:

Mineral (Other than Atomic and Hydrocarbons Energy Minerals) Concession Rules Featured

Kirloskar Ferrous Industires Limited vs Union Of India 2024 INSC 848 - MCR - MCDR -Royalty Computation

Mineral (Other than Atomic and Hydrocarbons Energy Minerals) Concession Rules, 2016 (MCR)- Explanation to Rule 38 ; Mineral Conservation and Development Rules, 2017 (MCDR) - Explanation to Rule 45(8)(a) - Validity of stipulation that computation of royalty to be levied for the extraction or consumption of mined ores-

Customs Act Featured

Commissioner of Customs vs Canon India Pvt. Ltd. 2024 INSC 854 - Article 137 Constitution - Review - Customs Act

Customs Act 1962- Section 28(11)- Constitutional Validity upheld- Its application is not limited to the period between 08.04.2011 and 16.09.2011. (Para 155) Finance Act 2022 - Section 97 - Constitutional Validity upheld. (Para 167) Constitution of India - Article 137 ; Supreme Court Rules, 2013

Arbitration Featured

GOQII Technologies Private Limited vs Sokrati Technologies Private Limited 2024 INSC 853 - S 11 Arbitration Act

Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 - Section 11 -The scope of inquiry under Section 11 of the Act, 1996 is limited to ascertaining the prima facie existence of an arbitration agreement - Frivolity in litigation too is an aspect which the referral court should not decide at the stage of

Arbitration Featured

Arif Azim Co. Ltd vs Micromax Informatics FZE 2024 INSC 850 - Arbitration - Seat & Venue Controversy

Arbitration & Conciliation Act 1996 - (i) Part I of the Act, 1996 and the provisions thereunder only applies where the arbitration takes place in India i.e., where either (I) the seat of arbitration is in India OR (II) the law governing the arbitration agreement are the laws of

Arbitration Featured

Aslam Ismail Khan Deshmukh vs ASAP Fluids Pvt. Ltd 2024 INSC 849 - S.11 Arbitration Act - Limitation

Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996- Section 11(6) - While determining the issue of limitation in the exercise of powers under Section 11(6) of the Act, 1996, the referral court must only conduct a limited enquiry for the purpose of examining whether the Section 11(6) application has been

Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act

Om Rathod vs Director General of Health Services 2024 INSC 836 - Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act - Reasonable Accomodation

Constitution of India -Articles 21, 19, 14 and 15 - Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act 2016 - Reasonable accommodation is a gateway right to avail all other fundamental, human and legal rights for persons with disabilities. Non-availability of reasonable accommodation amounts to discrimination and violates substantive equality of persons

Three Judges Bench

Nabha Power Limited vs Punjab State Power Corporation Limited 2024 INSC 833 - Contract - Customs Act